Did John Kerry Lie About Abortion?

CRISIS Magazine - e-Letter

February 20, 2004

**********************************************

Dear Friend,

While the Democratic primary has gotten more interesting with 
Senator John Edwards' strong showing Tuesday in Wisconsin, it still 
looks like Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts will be going 
head-to-head with President Bush in this fall's election.

This makes things interesting for voting Catholics -- after all, 
Kerry likes to tout his Catholic faith to prospective voters. Of 
course, this isn't always an easy thing to do, given the senator's 
strong support of abortion.

His strategy for getting away with this, though, is the same one 
used by so many "Catholic" politicians: He claims that while he's 
personally opposed to abortion, he can't let his religious belief get 
in the way of his policy-making. 

In fact, he told a reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that, 
"What I believe personally as a Catholic as an article of faith is an 
article of faith. And if it's not shared by a Jew or an Episcopalian 
or a Muslim or an agnostic or an atheist or someone else, it's not 
appropriate in the United States for a legislator to legislate your 
personal religious belief for the rest of the country."

Furthermore, Kerry's Deputy Communications Director, Dag Vega, 
confirmed with us that the senator is "personally opposed" to 
abortion while still remaining pro-choice publicly and politically.

Now, the "personally opposed" nonsense is easy enough to answer, and 
many have done it before. Obviously, abortion isn't a matter of faith 
but a matter of the right to life that is promised every American in 
the Constitution. You certainly don't have to be Catholic -- or even 
religious -- to believe that. 

But let's put all that aside for the moment... 

What if I told you that John Kerry might not be telling the truth 
about being "personally opposed"?

No, I'm not presuming to read Kerry's mind. In this case, I don't 
have to... his statements on the matter speak for themselves. Not 
only are they not the words of someone who considers abortion a 
tragic necessity, but Kerry proves himself an ardent supporter of the 
growth of the abortion industry, both here and around the world.

But don't take my word for it. Have a look at what Kerry said at 
last year's NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner:

"I think that tonight we have to make it clear that we are not going 
to turn back the clock. There is no overturning of Roe v. Wade...  
There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life 
or health and there are no more cutbacks on population control 
efforts around the world. We need to take on this President and all 
of the forces of intolerance on this issue. We need to honestly and 
confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we 
need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."

Did you catch that? Not only should abortion be available to all 
American women, all the time, but it should be used as a population 
control valve around the world. And this is something we should "be 
proud of." Not what you'd expect from someone who's "personally 
opposed" to abortion.

And this isn't an isolated comment...

From the Boston Herald on January 23, 2001: "I will not back away 
from my conviction that international family planning programs are in 
America's best interests. We should resist pressures in this country 
for heavy-handed Washington mandates that ignore basic choices that 
should belong to free people around the globe." 

Kerry's support for "international family planning programs" -- a 
standard euphemism for "abortion" -- is an issue he's advocated for 
some time. If Kerry is telling the truth about being "personally 
opposed" to abortion, why is he trying to spread it worldwide? That 
would be like me saying, "I personally oppose watching television, 
and it's about time we get a television in every home."

And then there's this gem from the 1994 Congressional record: "The 
right thing to do is to treat abortions as exactly what they are -- a 
medical procedure that any doctor is free to provide and any pregnant 
woman free to obtain. Consequently, abortions should not have to be 
performed in tightly guarded clinics on the edge of town; they should 
be performed and obtained in the same locations as any other medical 
procedure... [A]bortions need to be moved out of the fringes of 
medicine and into the mainstream of medical practice. And by the same 
token, if our children are to be safe from the danger of fanaticism, 
tolerance needs to spread out of the mainstream churches, mosques, 
and synagogues, and into the religious fringes."  

Abortion is simply "a medical procedure"? If that were true, then on 
what grounds could he possibly be personally opposed to it? He 
certainly doesn't seem to be struggling with the issue here. And how 
exactly does he propose to "spread tolerance" to the "religious 
fringes"? Presumably, he's referring to the people who, as an article 
of faith, believe abortion to be immoral. But doesn't he claim to be 
one of those very people? 

It just doesn't look like John Kerry is telling the truth on this. 
When he talks to Catholic and Hispanic groups, he plays up his 
personal struggle with abortion and his respect for Church teaching. 
But when his audience is less religious, he suddenly turns into a 
pro-abortion crusader. 

In the end, his "personally opposed" rhetoric doesn't fly... Kerry 
clearly isn't personally opposed to abortion. It's just a dodge he's 
using to pander to religious voters.

I wonder how many Catholics will fall for it.

I'll talk to you early next week,

Deal


*** 7 SECRETS THE POLLSTERS USE TO GET YOU TO SAY WHAT THEY WANT 
***

Learn the 7 secret tricks pollsters use to twist your most cherished 

beliefs...before they do it to you again! Once you know these 7 
simple 
tricks, you can turn the tables on the poll-takers and make sure 
your 
true opinions get heard...and reported!

You'll learn:

* The trick pollsters use to force you to agree with them before 
	you even answer their questions. 
* Why pollsters try to call you at dinnertime. (And no, it's not 
because "That's when you're home.")
* How they stack the answers to make sure you can't give your real 
opinion... and much more!

Click below to find out more!

http://www.crisismagazine.com/subscribe.htm
(copy and paste into your browser if you can't click)

**************************************************************

To subscribe to the FREE CRISIS Magazine e-Letter, and get the 
latest 
news, views, and responses to current issues, send an e-mail to 
e-letter@crisismagazine.com and write "SUBSCRIBE" in the subject 
line.

**************************************************************

To learn more about CRISIS Magazine, visit 
http://www.crisismagazine.com/subscribe.htm

**************************************************************

If you no longer wish to receive the CRISIS e-Letter, please send an 

e-mail to mail@crisismagazine.com and write "CANCEL" in the subject 

line. 

**************************************************************

To change your e-mail address, please send an e-mail to 
mail@crisismagazine.com with "ADDRESS CHANGE" in the subject line. 
Please make sure to tell us your old and new e-mail addresses, so we 
can 
make the change.

**************************************************************

Please forward this letter to anyone you think might benefit from 
it.